Re the photoshopped picture:
I can’t post the picture, but here is a link to Michelle Obama with no added male parts. There are many, many more of the same easily found through Google.
Scroll down to see the unphotoshopped picture.
The whole Michelle is really Michael meme is one of the more idiotic ones repeated daily here on FR.
Do you think that Obama has a secret compound in Thailand funded by Solyndra, too? That seems to be another popular idiocy at the moment,
“The whole Michelle is really Michael meme is one of the more idiotic ones repeated daily here on FR.”
-
I agree,and frankly I feel it makes FReepers look like fools.
.
I believe Michelle is a woman and that she birthed the two daughters. Otoh, the photo that looks anatomically questionable is not Photoshopped. I did some research on it. You can find—as indeed you did—images of MO in that same dress with nothing showing. But you cannot find an unphotoshopped pic of that exact pose that shows nothing. For whatever reason, when Michelle struck that particular pose, we got a look at more than we bargained for.
There is an image of Hillary in a pink outfit that appears to show incontinence. It took me ~1 minute to find the original, which shows zero sign of a stain. I.e.: *that* image is shopped.
Yesterday I found some Leftist sites that derided the idea that Michelle is sexually ambiguous. Not one of them—not a single one—claimed that the turquoise dress image is photoshopped. Trust me, if it were, that would have been their #1 talking point.
I don’t pretend to know what caused the strange shape in Michelle’s dress in that particular photo. I have seen a different image—a video—that raises even bigger questions. Again, I wouldn’t presume to know the answers. But something’s up; I can say that much with a fair degree of certitude.
Are you aware that there is a video of Obama referring to his wife multiple times as, “Michael,”? It’s not an urban legend; this video, like the other one I alluded to, is real.
Who knows the truth? Certainly not me. But to dismiss everything as a conspiracy theory/hoax doesn’t cover the facts either. There are more than two questionable images of Michelle. That’s way more than you can find of the average woman. Michelle and Obama—and probably Valerie Jarrett—know what’s going on. I’d imagine no one else does. But I offer these comments for what they’re worth. Fyi.
PS: You may have noticed that I asked the poster who proclaimed the turquoise dress image to be photoshopped to post an image of the un-shopped original. The reason it wasn’t posted is bc it doesn’t exist. That image, however odd and disconcerting, is real.
Again, for the record I believe Michelle is a lifelong female. But that doesn’t explain certain anomalies. As with so much related to the Obamas, there are legitimate questions. It’s not unreasonable to acknowledge this, as it happens to be the truth.
No doubt you believe all those pics of Obunga that have been exposed as fake are all legitimate? Or someone photoshopped them to get at him?
If you watch the video -- it's Michelle Obama's speech at the 2008 Democratic National Convention -- it's clear that the dress was tight and what you see is the pantyline and maxipad as she moves to and from the podium.
The picture posted may or may not have been photoshopped, but whoever originally posted the image definitely selected the frame to produce a false impression: idea that it shows a penis is moronic. You can check out the video on YouTube, but really, still photos of her in that dress and others reveal that she's not a man.
That story was just invented by a fake news outfit without any evidence or research. There's no reason to keep such an obviously false story alive.