Easy - because that would mean more White and Asian immigrants. You see they are Bell Curve deniers in public, but believe it in private.
Re: “The second question is why anyone would object to immigration that is based on the merit of each immigrant.”
Because new immigrant citizens vote 80% for the Democrat Party?
When you tout today’s Norway and other Scandinavian countries...socialist healthcare, atheist dominant, eco-maniac, abortion-friendly, suicide and euthanasia-friendly paradises that they are...
You sound like a Bernie bot. He wants us to be Denmark. Dontcha know?
I get it. You want borders. A wall. And a halt on immigrants. But lets stop with this Scandinavia’s so great nonsense. Their value system is what’s rotting away at Western civilization more than immigration.
Trump should start the deportation of the DACA “scReamers” effective immediately. The treason party has made it abundantly clear they do not want to compromise on anything and as a matter of fact are more obsessed with turning this whole thing into a ridiculous race issue. Start the deportations and make it courtesy of Dick Durtbin, Schmuck Schoomer, the Oscar winning actor Cory “tears of rage” Booker and the rest of these frauds who don’t give a damn about anybody but themselves.
Lets define naturalization....does anyone know its meaning? Are natural born and naturalization linked?
Yearnings to be with her own natural kind Wordsworth
Were all thy children kind and natural Shakespeare
The KINDLY fruits of the earth The Book of Common Prayer
Did the Founders and the Constitution limit Immigration to a natural kind?
Did Congress ever amend Article 1 Section 8?
Did Congress unnaturalize the country? Was it Constitutional?
But no one has come up with a sufficient response to the Democrat counter argument: RACIST RACIST RACIST.
I say this honestly and with sadness. The proper response, IMHO, IS FU, but that really isnt politically effective.