Your criteria for specificity and proof appear to be so rigidly narrow as to make certain your getting bit in the rear by false negative errors.
Drop the personal attacks and let's see what you've got. Tonight, the only attempt to claim that Q actually prophesied something, was that Q's post of quote "DEFCON 1" that he posted one week before the Hawaiian false missile alarm, actually somehow predicted it. I countered that Q posting a cryptic "DEFCON 1" doesn't have anything to do with Hawaii, and could have just as easily applied to Washington D.C. that is 5,000 miles away.
Are you saying he is correct and I am wrong? More accurately, is that the best example anyone has?