Posted on 01/16/2018 4:47:11 PM PST by ransomnote
My entertainment is outsmarting the enemy, and seeing justice served. Not falling prey to one of the enemy’s tools designed to take my nose off the scent.
strange that I copied from a prior post which I thought would lack any weird HTML codes and pasted it in believing the formatting would stay. IT was ugly BEFORE it lost it’s formatting. And was dismayed (nay - more like crushed) to see the resulting slop. Will have the maid mop that up soon.
I do and I needed the laugh!
You don't have to be foolish to fair-mindedly consider something. You write as though it is impossible for you to consider this topic fair-mindedly.
Dr Jordan Peterson (search youtube) notes that those who tend to be disagreeable WANT to win competitions.
Most of us are weary of p*ssing contests designed to show who has the longer manhood. We just want to collaboratively consider the evidence in a collegial atmosphere.
Thanks.
BTW, IF you want to collaborate via PM’s with Qx, on this topic, you could do that at GOPBR. We both think it is genuine and important enough to work together for the common good about it all.
Interesting. I will have to check it out.
Add me please.
Agreed. I did’t see it until after I sent. My Christmas list includes the ability to edit FR posts to repair lame mistakes! :)
Add me please.
Upon closer examination, this ‘snow’ thing is amazingly similar to what our icemakers put out; it seems if you could amass enough of it you could chill your orange juice or whiskey sour.
I’m doing experiments as we speak, will keep you posted with discoveries. It’s a pleasant white/clear ‘color’, scentless so far, and has the odd ability to camoflage possessions on your deck/patio into its presence.
Some weird stuff.
No Quix, or Quix-mate. I simply asked for any proof that this Q ever predicted anything in advance, with enough specificity, for it to have prepared anyone for an actual event, or prevented the event from actually happening.
I've asked this question multiple times, on multiple threads, and the answer is still no, he hasn't even actually predicted anything specific in advance. How could he, when he purposefully speaks in codes and riddles.
If you are interested in spending time reading and evaluating posts that have no value, other than in hindsight, then you are living in the past.
Add me please.
Definitely. Please add me.
I really appreciate your effort in following Q!
Yes
Yes, please.
Your criteria for specificity and proof appear to be so rigidly narrow as to make certain your getting bit in the rear by false negative errors.
Add please!
I would greatly appreciate it. If nothing else Q’s cryptic style inspires thought. At the end of the day, most of us just want truth and accountability.
Pls add me to your ping list
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.