So, let’s see, the Washington Post, which does nothing but print anti-Trump propaganda, claims that two people “briefed” on a meeting claim that Trump made some comments. They don’t claim that those people were actually AT the meeting, so they have NO first hand sources for this story (even though, to back it up, they reference an earlier story where Trump “reportedly” made similar comments, which could be similarly fiction, for all we know).
Then the media runs with the WaPo story, omitting the fact that they have quote no sources and don’t even claim to have a source who actually heard the comments in question.
And THEN the media wonders why people hate and distrust them.
And the Post is in such a bubble that they think this a problem?