Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: aquila48

The state never belonged in any form of compassion business in the first place. It was never intended.


39 posted on 12/31/2017 8:21:27 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Sequoyah101; hoagy62

“The state never belonged in any form of compassion business in the first place. It was never intended.”

Nor is it possible. The only thing the state can do is rob from Peter and give, more often than not, to an undeserving Paul.

Compassion must be viewed as a voluntary transaction between two individuals. What is exchanged is some goods in return for genuine gratitude.

State welfare programs require zero gratitude on the part of the recipient. In fact the recipient will sue the state (using a taxpayer funded lawyer) if the state fails to provide the welfare in a full and timely manner.

That’s about as far from the definition of compassion as one can get.


49 posted on 12/31/2017 8:52:04 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson