This needs to go to the US Supreme Court.
The question is being mulled in the Supreme Court. Bakeries owned by muslins apparently have immunity.
Judges. Tar. Feathers. Rail.
Mix together, cook over open flame, repeat as necessary.
STUPID STUPID LAWYERS!
They only need 1 Argument:
My clients strictly follow the Koran and Islamic Sharia Law regarding Human Sexuality. As Proud religious Citizens adhering to Islam and the Koran we are Forbidden by our Religious Beliefs from baking this cake for the sodomite infidels.
Let them Choke on that!!!
I’m curious, if anyone knows. Did the “gay couple” essentially target the Christian bakers?
Was that brought up or a factor in the case?
Sorry I’m too lazy to research this myself...figure someone that follows this knows.
Is the Oregon governor also a judge?
Is that how much wedding cakes go for these days? I spent much less on mine, but I’ve been married for almost 25 years.
Federal courts...
if I was the baker, I would make the cake. It would be beautiful on the outside, dry and tasteless on the inside. It would be hard to prove that it was deliberate....
Why don’t they just bake it and substitute salt peter for sugar. If they don’t like the cake, they can find another baker.
That article is a mess. It should have been broken into three or four smaller articles on a single topic. I was pretty interested in the bakery case, not so much in their criticism of Robert Spencer’s review of a book by some gay guy.