He did work for Obama for many years, didn't he? And didn't he agree to.an extension under Obama? An extension that exceeded the normal term limit for FBI director? Why in the world do you think he would have agreed to continue to be the top cop for the Obama’s criminal enterprise, if he wasn't satisfied with the output of their work? Because it's not like he wasn't somehow complicit in everything they did, being in charge of the FBI all that time.
Eric Holder was his boss up the chain too. Would you have agreed to be extended under Holder? A guy who was known for being the only US Attorney General to held in contempt of Congress, if you didn't know. Also known for such scandals as Fast and Furious, otherwise known as “Project Gunrunner,” and the targeting by the IRS of conservatives, among a whole host of other things. And there was your boy Mueller, supposedly the top cop in America?
Don't forget that Mueller worked directly for James Comey at one point too. The two are considered close friends and their relationship is one of the core conflicts of interest that Mueller has that resulted in Mueller now having a conflict of interestnwaiver on fire for being allowed as special prosecutor. It's even been learned that Mueller was secretly meeting with Comey just before Comey testified to Congress, likely to work on their plan to impeach the President.
Andrew McCabe rose to power in Mueller's FBI too. He started out with them right about the time Mueller became director, and quickly worked his way up, despite being directly involved with scandals like the Boston marathon bombing and the Benghazi investigation. He's also well known for helping Comey and Mueller oversee the destruction of evidence and refusal to charge the Clintons or any of their associates for years of crimes against the US.
Then you've got Strozk and Page, who Mueller hand picked to be on his impeachment team of agents to investigate the President, with Strzok listed as the top FBI agent on the case. Mueller had Strzok running the ground operation, getting Michael Flynn for perjury which is so far the Grand Prize of the investigation.
Yet somehow, despite all these close associations with Mueller, despite all the evidence that Mueller is coming after Trump with everything he has, and the endless support that Mueller has received lately from Holder, and Comey, and Yates, you still want to insist that Mueller has secretly working against them?
And all you really have for evidence is that he met with Trump, once? A meeting that Trump has said should have disqualified him from being special counsel, because it is possible that whatever they discussed was supposed to be held in confidence, but maybhavecactually been a trick to gather evidence against the President?
I hope you'll look at the depth of the connections Mueller has to those attempting to take down the President, and realize your evidence to the contrary pales in comparison, in fact it's almost non-existent. Most everyone else sees it as a no brainer, including all the President's supporters in Congress and the conservative media. Maybe you just like being the contrarian, in the face of overwhelming odds, but this appears to be a colossal failure of judgment on the most important political event in decades. Just know this - if Mueller ends up arresting the President's son, or his son-in-law next, as is widely rumored, you're going to have a really tough time selling this BS any more. In fact you'll have a lot to answer for why you supported Mueller to the point we are now.
Time will tell. Cheers!