It almost appears that you disagree with my assessment that the guy is a twit for holding the view in question because other people hold such views?
please note that I’m not saying that you hold said views
No, I disagree that he is a twit for applying the societal rules as currently defined and concluding they would be classified as sex assault perpetrators.
Under societal rules as currently defined (no matter how outrageous they are), he is arguably correct in his conclusion.
The problem is that societal rules are currently defined in a manner that is stupidly outrageous.
And thank you for avoiding any ad hominem attacks in your post, FRiend. Merry Christmas to you and yours!
One more note - He is a sociology professor, whose job is to teach how to interpret societal rules and apply them. I think he has done this - perhaps over zealously - but in a manner that is probably justified due to the outrageous “rules” currently embraced by society.