It’s been displayed on a regular basis since 1998. It seems a little late to get all outraged about it now.
I don’t even find it all that offensive. I think the artist was making a [albeit “in your face] statement denouncing the commercialization of Christmas - and I don’t disagree with his sentiments.
Sort of a lame metaphor given that Christmas and Easter are carelessly mixed, perhaps the Easter bunny in a nativity scene for balance?