Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan

I tend to agree that what you really had in the Soviet Union was State Capitalism. There’s always going to be Capital, it’s a question of who controls it. What were the “Five-Year Plans”? They basically were a blueprint as to how Capital was to be allocated by the State.

If anything, the closest thing to real “Communism” in terms of the workers controlling the means of production, is basically to give them shares of stock in the company.


3 posted on 12/15/2017 6:29:20 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

I have always thought that capitalism exists to some extent in any system that produces any goods that are then used/distributed/sold for their value. Even in the purest communism the workers are getting something for what they produce.

Capitalism is not a political ideology or a form of government no matter how much leftists try to frame it as such.


5 posted on 12/15/2017 7:10:55 PM PST by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

If you’d look into Qadaffy’s regime in Libya that was actually really close to a ‘real thing’. With all the oil wealth and no taste for golden Ferraris and/or ‘prestige’ global jihad programs he had tons of money to build Communism without much redistribution and oppression.


19 posted on 12/15/2017 11:46:31 PM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson