If none of you want to give your own explanation of Obama’s personal claim to Selma, that’s understandable. Presumably even Obots have limits when it comes to looking idiotic.
Otoh, I’m genuinely curious. Surely Obama’s leftist apologists have offered some theory account for his psychotic remarks. There has never, after all, been any shortage of leftists who are willing to look moronic on Obama’s behalf.
This being so, surely one of you trusty Obots can give us the official line. How did Obama’s enablers attempt to justify the craziness at the time? You have the president of the United States claiming that an event in ‘65 precipitated his birth four years earlier. On its face, that’s certifiably insane.
So how did Obama’s handlers account for it? What line did they feed the knee-pad press? You must know. Why not share?
Note: Obama made the claim that the ‘65 march in Selma led to his birth in 2007. All the better. He should have been called out on his stupidity, his ignorance, and/or dishonesty before he cheated Hillary out of the nomination. Psychologically speaking, it was a disqualifier.
The Left is so accustomed to excusing any idiotic or dishonest thing a favorite leftist minority might say or do, they’ve lost all perspective. They no longer recognize psychological red flags in any context. They see them when they’re nonexistent (as in Trump’s case) and miss them when they’re flashing like 100 foot neon signs.
The Democrats have become the party of the insane. Literally.