Statistically speaking, no one person could have so many issues for a normal, straightforward hospital birth. The average person has zero anomalies. I had to pick and choose for my list, but Obama has even more than I ended up mentioning. If you are an Obot, you will not be able to detect a pattern or weigh the cumulative evidence. Anyone else possessed of average intelligence would have no difficulty in doing so.
Of course it’s a fact that not everyone understands statistical probability. I had the extraordinary privilege of auditing Gian-Carlo Rota’s course on probability at MIT, coupled with the guidance of a gifted associate who was able to translate it for me. I can tell you that one anomaly for a person with a normal US hospital birth would be odd but not statistically relevant. Two would be very strange. When you get to three you’re into a pattern. Twelve-plus is simply not something that spontaneously happens in real life. Statistically speaking that would make a three sigma event appear commonplace.
Again though, I stress: none of this will register for an Obot. They have trained themselves to turn off the critical-rational thought process when it comes to anything that challenges Obama’s nativity tale. They are unable to evaluate facts pertinent to this issue, and are unaware of this inability. I’ve never encountered an Obot with whom it was otherwise. It most likely devolves from blind support for a pathological liar. No one can engage in that kind of activity long term and expect to suffer no deleterious side effects.
You’re still fixated on the Hawaii narrative (however anomalous it is) even though your hypothesis is that she was in the Vancouver/Seattle area and we’re still waiting for the evidence you’ve gathered to support it.