‘Except of course for the February, 1961 wedding on Maui per the memo by Lyle H. Dahling.’
Who witnessed that wedding? Obama/Ayers treated it like the plague in Dreams. It’s a bizarrely weird description—consider rereading it sometime. It’s almost as if they are trying to tell us it never happened.
Forget reporters. It’s the biographers who worked so hard to place Stanley Ann in HI during her pregnancy. The idea that they found witnesses and ignored them is absurd. David Maraniss’ inability to find a single person who placed SA in HI during that timeframe was seen as support for birtherism—I kid you not. In the interview in which he was asked about birthers, can you really with a straight face claim he found witnesses but simply opted not to mention them?
‘Or maybe they had died by 2008 when reporters came a knocking’
Is HI supposedly bad for people’s health? Plenty of people remember SA from both her Mercer Island days and from her Seattle hiatus. Why are WA State people so much longer lived than HI people?
You do not know that airlines in ‘61 allowed newborns to fly with a dr’s note. It is pure speculation. Besides, what was the emergency/urgency? SA claimed to be in love with her ‘husbsnd.’ Why the mad, costly flight to get away from him?
“Who witnessed that wedding?”
Only need one and it can be the Justice of the Peace who performs the ceremony.
Obviously they were married enough so that she had to hire an attorney and go through a legal divorce. And for Judge King to decree “due proof was made to this Court that the said parties are legally intermarried.”
Both of her marriages appear in the Department of Health’s index.
It's not speculation really. Currently, the FAA allows infants from 1 week old to fly and here's a press article showing how babies travelled on aircraft in the 1950's:
https://www.boredpanda.com/vintage-infants-airplane-skycot-boac-flights/
If the rules have changed, then there should be a record of it that you can find to support your assertion.