But do recognize that in the case of FISA Court issues and in many other matters that National Security requirements can legitimately provide an escape clause to limit testimony.
Personally I believe that Wray was on solid ground yesterday. FISA Court proceedings are classified and properly so.
I watched most of it, and Wray defended McCabe when questioned by Gohmert. He also used to work for Comey according to some here. Which could make him part of that same long time Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein click.
Forget the proceedings. What Goodlatte and Jordan want to see is the application generated by the FBI to seek FISA approval to monitor the Trump campaign and transition teams. The Judiciary Committee has oversight over the FBI and the DOJ. It has every right to see this material, classified or not.
I would have to respectfully disagree, to take your position of “National Security” being a valid excuse, one would have to declare the Fake Dossier Manufactured by a Political Party then used by the Law Enforcement Agencies of the Federal Government to Overturn a Duly Elected President and all the Illegal Acts that follow a “Real” National Security issue, when in reality it is nothing more than a Conspiracy of an attempted Coup De’tat.
Everything about this Fraud is based on Manufactured Political Lies, hardly National Security unless COvering your ass for your own Illegal Acts is now a National Security issue.