[50mm]

I didn’t think so. Maybe you should carefully review Jim’s comments in that thread. They’re among the most punitive and at the same time entertaining comments Jim has ever made. I bookmarked it and go there to get some chuckles when I’m feeling out of sorts.

[rx]

Whatever the good Jim's comments are, I'm confident any shortcomings noted in other places or at other times haven't manifested themselves in the book, which I understand was vetted by several very competent professionals. Thus, I doubt the book or this partial presentation contains any of that of which you seem fearful, or perhaps that's "by which you would be entertained."

For myself, I'm always open to a collegial discussion on the merits of an interesting case and much less so on the personalities that might be finding the fleeting derision of the moment. If someone seems to cross an inappropriate line, assuming the subject matter is sufficiently interesting or important, I would generally try to see whether that person can be reined in to be productive to the conversation. If not, I would move on.

I'm convinced that history teaches us that false flag operations have been de rigeur for many governments in the last couple of hundred years, such that we always need to be vigilant, question authorities, and scrutinize their actions closely if we wish to maintain our republican government Of, By, and For the People. We need to make sure it represents our best ideals, as we've been graciously endowed by our Creator and as first handed down in our country's founding documents and strengthened through history's tests.