Since you seem to agree with me that the contention (that she willingly / knowingly acted as a "stalking horse") probably can't be proven - unless she volunteers the information - then it would perhaps be more prudent to withhold judgement, don't you think?
Regards,
big difference between criminal liability and social liability. I think it can be proven whether this happened or not. I just think that there is no law that it can be proven she has broken...there is no law against an individual having standards of behavior. its the same thing as disapproving of someone being a bully in there social interaction and letting others know that the person is so they cant harm someone or informing people that someone cant be trusted with confidential information.
big difference between criminal liability and social liability. I think it can be proven whether this happened or not. I just think that there is no law that it can be proven she has broken...there is no law against an individual having standards of behavior. its the same thing as disapproving of someone being a bully in there social interaction and letting others know that the person is so they cant harm someone or informing people that someone cant be trusted with confidential information.