It’s at Mexican Standoff.
O’keefe’s New York Times expose was good but POORLY TIMED because it was when the Weinstein scandal broke — when for once journalists at least pretended to do their jobs by breaking the stories...(Albeit it was Ronan Farrow of the New Yorker not New York Times who had the courage to press forward with it FIRST as the others sat on the story for YEARS!)
The New York Times expose from last October*
Another useless column from the beta male faggots at National Review.
At least he’s attempting to expose the MSM. He landed some punches on the NYT and the WaPo footage showed what we all knew - they’re extremely biased.
I have no use for National Reviews’ analysis or opinion on anything at all.
There are probably listening devices and software in the Project Veritas offices, phones and computers. The Left is well funded.
It’s funny how the media studiously ignores or downplays O’Keefe’s numerous successful exposes — like when Democrat operative and frequent White House visitor David Creamer admitted on camera that he hired the mentally ill to provoke violence at Trump rallies — but then when one misfires suddenly it’s FRONT PAGE NEWS!!1!.
How long was she in the WaPo office before they determined she was not a real victim? How did they determine this? Perhaps they know that all the supposed victims are fake, and she was not one of theirs? This story should not be over. I want to know the vetting procedure and how they determined she was a false victim.
James O’Keeffe should have won Pukelitzer awards on so many stories! I love his chutzpah!
James O’Keefe is a real hero, almost as much influence for good as Jim Robinson.
I love all the stories naty review has broken in the last generation...
With all his homers, he’s allowed to strike out on occasion.
Hopefully, they’ll learn from their mistake.
Wow, O’Keefe has actually succeeded in making the WaPo vet their hit-pieces for a change before they libel conservatives.
Good Job!
The only gonzo source here is the National Review. Can’t win them all but at least his tries are heroic. The National Review? Gutless purveyors of homogeneity.
O’Keefe 27
MSM 01
I sense an upset here!!......The MSM may have just discovered that the “truth” may be an honest Defense.....he-he...He's got them nervous about running the “FAKE-NEWS” plays again...
The NR sit upon their embroidered tuffets within their gilded salons, thinking and consternating, all the live long day. It's oh so teddibly, teddibly hard.
They jabber incessantly with each other, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. They are emasculated, the very definition of "low T". The NR is little more than a glorified hen house full of clucking old biddies
“had yet another of his undercover sting operations blow up in his face”
What other?
They can downplay it all they want, but the fact is that the Compost got sucked in, and spent weeks talking to this woman in hopes of getting dirt on Judge Moore. They wasted manpower, and funds pursuing this story, which to me is a win for our side.
Sometimes you kill the bear etc etc.