Stephen Marche comes across as a sodomite ... and a catcher, not a pitcher.
Actually, he is (at least publicly) straight and married:
But seeing as he lives in Sodom East (NYC) and is a liberal journalist, his world view is thoroughly corrupted.
And like all good liberal hacks, he has no problem in painting with a very very broad brush when it comes to the group target for their hate.
The problem with his analysis is that he thinks that the problem is based in male sexuality when it is really the corrupting nature of power being expressed through abusive sexual conduct by certain men towards women and men the abusers feel are vulnerable.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely goes the old saying. But everybody knows that and rather that recognize these scandals are yet another example in a very long line of examples, Mr. Marche has decided that all men everywhere, whether they have this power or not, are to blame and must reform themselves by talking to each other.
That will probably work among his fellow travelers in echo chamber of Manhattan. I’d like to see him try to strike up such a conversation in, say, Waco, Texas or Kingman, Arizona. He might, if he is lucky, get off with just an explicative-laden dressing down.
Since the article is underpinned by claims of the need for equality between the sexes, it is curious to note that there haven’t been any salacious disclosures yet concerning sexually abusive conduct by powerful women. It is hard to believe that the the corrupting nature of this kind of power is limited only to men. Is it that powerful women express its corrupting nature is other ways? Or are the abuses out there but being suppressed through consensus (or intimidation) because it would be distracting from the “all men are evil” narrative being put forward by the anti-patriarchy, anti-white, and LBGT elements of the liberal/left?