To: Boiler Plate
Direct evidence would have been [...]Scientists almost never expect to find "direct evidence."
Rather, several items of mutually-supporting indirect evidence are considered more than sufficient to work with.
Regards,
44 posted on
11/23/2017 9:05:07 PM PST by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: alexander_busek
Exactly! So it should not be called Direct Evidence as though it was a Detective Show. Most likely the scientists did not put that way, only the writer.
Cheers,
48 posted on
11/24/2017 1:54:41 PM PST by
Boiler Plate
("Why be difficult, when with just a little more work, you can be impossible" Mom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson