are you missing the point that they are trying to destroy Roy Moore on MUCH LESS evidence?
Pointing out the HUGE double standard is what is important here
I think my last post explained it (a minute ago). My whole point is that there is no actual evidence against moore. It is therefore an irrelevance to me. The franken case has evidence, but it’s irrelevant as well. Too minor.
I think he wasn’t so much talking about Franken. He was just mentioning the other part of this whole issue, that abuse and sexual abuse has been expanded to a ridiculous point now. You can tell someone they look nice and that is “harassment”.
Unless i miss the mark he was was simply saying that being male is pretty much criminalized these days, not commenting on Franken per se.