Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mustangman
At the core of Lincoln’s presidency was the issue of slavery and at the core of the civil war was the issue of slavery.

So say you. However the facts do not support that conclusion.

14 posted on 11/19/2017 7:40:22 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

In Georgia the largest slave holding percentage in the South less than 15% of the population owned slaves. Most people never owned a slave. They were fighting for states rights and to repel an invading military force.

The South was not trying to overthrow the United States govt or take and occupy Northern territory or the US capital. They were trying to withdraw from the social compact called the Constitution which they had every right to do. That right was taken from them at the point of a gun. It does not mean they didn’t have that right and still have it today.

Lincoln didn’t give a rats azz about slavery until the war was not going well and the general mood of the Northern population was against continuing the conflict. He needed something to whip up sentiment so he could continue to raise money and keep the war going. So he used the abolitionists and slavery to advance his agenda. Its called politics.


15 posted on 11/19/2017 8:17:36 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson