Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Your factoids from the last half of the 19th Century persisted with some change into the early 20th Century in the former Old West, in my paternal grandparents’ case in KS. My grandmother began having children at age 20 in 1902 and concluded at age 40, bearing 10 children, 9 living to adulthood. So her progeny mostly beat the infant mortality stats. Her husband died at age 51 of abdominal sepsis from a burst appendix. She died 8 years later at age 50 of cervical cancer.


43 posted on 11/17/2017 2:16:03 PM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: T-Bird45

The infant mortality rates impacted longevity, but in a nuanced way. If average lifespan was, say, 40, anyone who survived beyond infancy actually had as much chance of living to 70 as much later. The high infant mortality rates skewed longevity, which was an average.


44 posted on 11/17/2017 2:22:37 PM PST by sparklite2 (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson