Posted on 11/16/2017 11:07:48 AM PST by Elderberry
Cell Phone Data
At the same time, while the cell phones of most Twin Peaks Mass Murder witnesses were searched, there doesn’t seem to be any public record that Doan’s cell phone or the cellphones of other Twin Peaks employee witnesses were ever examined by police. It has just never come up in the criminal cases. But it is an issue in the Multi District Litigation against the restaurant that is unfolding in Dallas. In fact, besides never being searched by police, Doan’s cellphone seems to have disappeared from June 2015 until November 8, 16 days after he testified in the Carrizal trial.
According to records in the civil cases, Doan’s phone was searched by a Houston company called Equivalent Data, LLC, “on or about June 10, 2015. Lawyers for the Twin Peaks turned over “a forensic image” of Doan’s phone to plaintiffs in the civil case but the “image” didn’t contain any text messages. The texts remained lost until plaintiffs in the civil case tried to subpoena the information on Doan’s phone directly from the Equivalent Data, which in the meantime has become a company called Consilio LLC.
That was when the text messages that were on Doan’s phone on May 17, 2015 reappeared. The complete image of Doan’s phone, including his texts was turned over to plaintiffs’ attorneys last Thursday, just as the jury on the Carrizal trial began to deliberate
Probably none of this means much but the timing makes this an interesting series of events. And, the devil is always in the details.
(Excerpt) Read more at agingrebel.com ...
Thanks for post.
Thanks for update very interesting stuff
Did the texts have any relevance to the trial?
If it did, it probably would have only been helpful for the defense, but it's disclosure was too late to be any use.
Thanks for “Probably none of this means much”?
“Probably none of this means much”
At this point it probably doesn’t, since, like so much else from the prosecution team, they didn’t cough it up until it was no longer relevant. Still, the jury saw through the corruption, except for a couple who, like you, didn’t give a damn about the law and due process and just wanted to “convict a biker”.
“Still, the jury saw through the corruption, except for a couple who, like you, didn’t give a damn about the law and due process and just wanted to “convict a biker”.”
Why do you support freeing murdering pimping pedophiles?
Assumes facts not in evidence.
For the record, I don't.
Why do you slander people you don't even know?
Yeah, and...
Why do you keep defending these gangsters?
When did I do that?
I said you boyfriend didn’t prove this defendant murdered anyone. And he didn’t even charge anyone with being a “pimping pedophile”.
Was this Texas jury “defending these gangsters” since all of them agreed with me except a couple who the others said refused to consider the evidence, like you?
“When did I do that?”
Everytime I discuss the gangsters you come back to defend them!!!!!!!
“When did I do that?”
Step and say it! The Cossacks, Bandidos and all their supporting clubs are criminals.
Use all the exclamation points you want, I have not defended "gangsters", I have stood up for the rule of law. Why do you defend a corrupt lawless DA?
Assumes facts not in evidence. So far the only defendant to be tried has no criminal record.
I will concede this, the only people we know of shot by police were Cossacks, and two police UCs were wearing Cossacks (red boots) cuts, so yes, the Cossacks may be criminals.
There you go again! Defending gangsters!
Very slowly, point to exactly where I "defended gangsters". Be specific and show your work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.