Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble
Article I, §5, clause 2: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.”

I have not researched this, but as a lawyer my immediate reaction is that the disorderly behavior must occur while a senator in order for expulsion to be an option.

18 posted on 11/13/2017 4:49:06 PM PST by KevinB (When you drink the water, remember the men or women who dug the well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: KevinB

Article I, §5, clause 2: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.”
I have not researched this, but as a lawyer my immediate reaction is that the disorderly behavior must occur while a senator in order for expulsion to be an option.

There may be something to that. For example.. “punish it’s members...” He’s not a member, nor is he allowed on the floor (if he wins) until he’s sworn in. And they could refuse to swear him in .

If he’s out of the Senate one way or another by Senate decision, the Senate could order a special election as they have done before? Or, could the Governor appoint a replacement for the vacancy as they normally do for vacancies? I don’t think Democrats would like that option.
And is there a Senate definition for disorderly behavior?

This whole situation is why we have lawyers.


28 posted on 11/13/2017 6:02:26 PM PST by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson