[adorno]

Sounds like you have no clue about that which you speak. Ooh, I don't know.

After about 40 years in IT and software development and project management in many different corporations and many different types of businesses, I would think that I do know what I'm talking about, and likely way better than you. "LiMuX" was not cutting it, and it wasn't forward compatible with the "current way" of doing things, and most of applications which were/are written for Windows, do not get along well with Linux implementations.

So, why not prove me wrong instead of just taking a cheap shot at me?

[ShadowAce]

Because the comment you made about Linux being left behind in cloud technology is just laughable.

Does Windows even do containers? Can Windows run from removable devices? Linux is way more advanced in cloud technology (in fact, it runs most--if not all--clouds). How many Windows machines are in the Top500 list? How many are Linux?

If you want to throw around qualifications, then I've been involved with computers and IT for just a tad over 40 years myself. I have the degrees, experience, and RHCE to prove it. Those don't matter as much, though. What matters is that you throw around comments like "Going forward, Limux and many Linux distros, would have been left incompatible with the cloud way of doing things" and expect that people would just accept it, when the facts are obviously exactly the reverse of what you just said.

[GingisK]

Because I've been in the same business for 50 years,and like cheap shots. ;-D

Windows bloats, and bloats, and bloats.