[Steve_Seattle]

" . . . she typically had a “strict curfew.” But because of Moore’s stature, her mother felt comfortable allowing him to see her."

In 1979, Moore was just a few years out of law school, had never run for public office, and was an attorney either in private practice or just starting out in the prosecutor's office. (I can't narrow the timeline any more than that.) How did he have such "stature" in the community at that time?

[Redwood71]

” How did he have such “stature” in the community at that time?”

He still had stature until this, so called, incident surfaced.

My question still is if she was molested when she was 14 by Moore, then why did she date him four years later as stated in the article I read if she was that repulsed by him telling him to “get it over with” in her childhood?

And then now come out with this? Something is wrong here. This has more angles than a tennis match. Who is to be believed at this point? I’m not saying he isn’t guilty, I’m saying the voting public isn’t getting everything in a correct order or fact.

rwood