- Just one correction... of so many possible ones.
I don’t despise you. I pity you.
Hold on a sec. I did not use the word "despise" in the post you have addressed this reply of yours to. I used that word in the next posted comment. But I see the game. You refuse to reply to comments that seriously crater your arguments -- or reply to anything where you may have to agree with little 'ol me. Is your ego truly that fragile? Apparently, it is. But just think, man! If you could get through your head that what I was saying about the law itself (that it is not against the law to be a member of a gang) that could go a long way towards ratcheting down the acrimony around here regarding "issues" surrounding the subject matter of this thread. In not too much time also, if we we're to be able to come to some place of 'starting over' it could help raise respect for LE efforts too (thus serving to help squelch the wildest of the wild-eyed, anti-LE conspiracy theories) -- if we were not fighting over the one fundamental difference of opinion that I framed in post #86.
Return to #86 and answer the questions put to you there (with a double heaping helping of the "magic words"!).
Do you want peace among the brethren (that would be -- the citizenry of the US, at large) or must you thrive on instabilities between State (powers) and citizenry? What type of creature is it that you would prefer to be feeding?
The only other option I can see is that (other than merely misunderstanding the one point) you're some sort of relatively shallow-minded 'operator' come to FR to try to steer public perceptions and sentiments. Either way, it must suck to be you. So make "peace" while you have an opportunity -- or else continue suffering being on the losing end of the, ah, politics of personal destruction.
I set in front of you a basket of curses (aimed right at your head) in #85 that was fairly representative of the sort of things I've been saying to you in reaction your own assaults upon my own, and other's character). It's no wonder your poor wittle fee-wings were so hurt.
In #86 I pointed right at just exactly where the fundamental disagreement we have been having arose. If that were to be cleared up -- then things could be so much more rational, and less emotionally driven. I've been trying to get you to focus on that single point for months now (to get it through your head -- anything based upon misunderstanding of that will preclude possibility for rational discussion) but you keep RUNNING AWAY -- which is why I've also painted you to be intellectually, a coward.
- You were probably once smart and rational, and not in favor of drug dealing, murdering motorcycle thugs.
I see that myself having singled you out as being a Federal (or possibly only State) agent really got you all "triggered". Whether you are, or possibly not (that latter possibility, perhaps only on the slim picken's side?) when pressured ---- we get to see what comes out of you when the squeeze in on. I'm not the only one around here who sees most of it to be the semi-well camouflaged posturing and posing that it is.
- Then something happened. Probably drugs and/or drinks... and way too many of them... and now you.... are you.
Let's see... this kind of tone you're trying to sell... that's part of the standing on street corner virtue-signalling thing you've got goin' on. Next you'll tell me that you'll be a-praying. Like, you're so "concerned" over my own well being? Phfft. Sell that noise on some other corner. It's too late for you to tell me you're such a 'virgin'. Those nylon fishnets (stockings) you're wearing are dirty, and have gaping holes in 'em bigger than the all the littler holes.
Worried about your "image"? Concerned over how others may view you? Uhm. I see. I've been bad for your rep around here, and back at the office where you work -0- those guys are getting a kick out of this. That's the part that's really hard on your ego. (?)
- Hate filled, irrational, (and blind to it,) promoting criminal behavior...
I do hate you surely enough (you have succeeding in drawing that out of me, but then again, that was the purpose for yourself being here -- to stir up those Tea Party types, wasn't it?) although I should pity you more than I do, and "hate" less, generally speaking. That's a failing on my own part. A weak point. But promoting criminal behavior? You must have me confused with somebody else. I'm not all those other people who live rent-free in your head (that have railed at LE and prosecutors). I'm only me.
I see too that you won't let go of this "promoting criminal behavior" falsehood that you keep trying to use in personally defensive reaction, hucking it at me, ascribing motives to myself for what I say -- instead of delving into examination of what I state ARE my own motives, and the underlying reasons for those.
But then again, you've got to reach for something to hit at me with in desperate effort to make yourself look good, first -- in your own eyes -- then, in hopes others will believe the bullshitting you keep engaging in.
What I don't get is how it could be possible that you would not be a Fed (or maybe even a DA somewhere, perhaps part of Fed agency legal council. Are you using TOR?) unless you truly are so stupid that you believe your own lies. Or, the other glaringly obvious possibility -- your self-image is so fragile, so brittle-like, that for you to admit to having been mistaken -- publicly -- is just too much.
So which is it? Federal troll -- or fragile ego (azz-hole) who gets his kicks puking at people who oppose himself -- thinking if he can just keep on being a wise-ass (now new and improved! with even more supplemental 'concern'!) it will show how "smart" he is, how moral he himself is, thus he must be right in the rest of his huffin' and puffin? Maybe a blend of those, eh?
I mean, being so dumb -- that one begins to believe their own (and their agency's?) PR (and even lies)---that's about the size of it for a LEO (or former LEO) such as Princess Puddles (aka TG).
But in your case, if we are to believe much of anything that you say for yourself, you're supposed to be one of the more elite. Why is it that you can't even get past the likes of me then? I'm nothing special. If you're a lawyer, you must really suck. Maybe there's some isolated specialty area wherein you have some expertise and don't? Suck, I mean.
What specialty area would that be? C'mon, you can tell the folks here at FR. We're your FRiends ain't we? Well, except for me of course, but shoot, I don't count for much. I'm only one guy.
See you Soon,
Tell us what your previous freepname was, and I'll see if I can coax the old elves into making for you something really special.