Being as I cannot rationally expect that other son-of-a-bitch to understand simple precepts, and engage in discussion in rational, reasonable manner (narrowly) pertaining to those ---- perhaps you could?
It seems you me that you could.
Do understand what was being talked about in comment #86?
Was there any of that 'syndrome' in evidence there? If so, then knock yourself out, and show where, why, and just how.
I'm not super familiar with Texas statutes but afaik simply being a member of a gang isn't against the law. It certainly colors the way law enforcement views you though.
If fact there was testimony from the stand that known gang members were prohibited from carrying weapons in public.
I don't know how accurate that testimony is or whether Jake Carrizal has a criminal history, but it does open the door to whether or not he had a right to be carrying a gun that day.