Women owe men for the past 200 years’ of defending the country.
So we should draft only women for the next 200 years.
After that, we’ll do it 50-50.
Because, you know, there are no differences between men and women, and no job a man can do that a woman can’t do better.
(And that’s exactly the kind of “logic” the looney left loves...)
I believe you will find for the last wars dating all the way back to WW1 that women, voluntarily have served, been injured and killed. All this talk of 'frontlines' being the only place the military can get killed. I owe a few women a lot from the Army. The nurses at 93rd evac hospital in Long Binh during TET for example. The constant rocketing/mortar shelling of this facility had to be nerve wracking for these 'non-combatants'. At 18 yrs old watching nurses a few years older than me feverishly moving wounded grunts under the beds as crud from the ceilings rained down on the beds from concussions of close hits. My nurse, a bare slip of a girl staying by my bedside because with a lung wound I had to stay on the bed for the chest tube to drain, staying close in case I needed intervention instead of being safe in the bunker. I wouldn't wish any more combat exposure for her or her fellow nurses. What should I owe her for protecting me ? As Chainmail stated above, if we are down to 'having' to draft women into combat roles, we are lost. The snowflake millennials in the colleges better all be in front of the first woman drafted to take a bullet instead of them.