The informant is not going to have a smoking gun. He was with an American company dealing with Russians at a business level. Anything he can relate about the Clintons will be hearsay. It might be very interesting, but it won’t meet legal standards as the basis of prosecuting Hill and Bill.
Even with taped evidence?
“The informant is not going to have a smoking gun.”
Are you an attorney or a Trump insider or are you just blowing smoke out your butt?
The FBI can even say they were snookered into buying off on a false document and at the end of the day this will probably all look like dirty tricks right out of a Robert Ludlum novel.
Hate to always be a pessimist but that’s what I think. It’ll be a big nothingburger.
He has bank transaction records, video taped recordings, etc. He was hired by this firm with an exhorbitant salary and was told half of it would have to paid to other entities as kick backs, bribes. That’s how he decided to contact the FBI.