To: Bull Snipe
That’s considered the beginning of England, as we know it today.
...made it almost 1000 years.
5 posted on
10/14/2017 8:56:37 AM PDT by
BobL
To: BobL
He probably weeps for it now.
7 posted on
10/14/2017 9:01:11 AM PDT by
wally_bert
(I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
To: BobL
Cool. That was the time our family got started in England
9 posted on
10/14/2017 9:06:22 AM PDT by
Bogie
To: BobL
As we know it today. There have been no subsequent successful invasions by any subset of the French (Henry Tudor, a Welshman, and Dutch William of Orange in his bloodless "Glorious Revolution" later on landed and overthrew dynasties). Duke William was a French speaking Norman - Viking descent - with military technology and organization much superior to the shield-wall fighting English. Even with that, until the English broke ranks at Hastings and King Harald took an arrow in his eye they were having the better of the battle. It took generations for the Norman rulers to become Englishmen, final act their being kicked out of all their possessions in France. England gained its name and became a unified state under Alfred, Saxon King of Wessex, and his immediate descendants. Hence the other name for the English race, Anglo-Saxons. And "as we know it today" the country's in transition to voluntary dhimmitude.
23 posted on
10/14/2017 11:01:27 AM PDT by
katana
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson