Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber
The Standard Model is surprisingly accurate.

So was Newton's until Einstein came along.
5 posted on 10/11/2017 7:42:46 PM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: akalinin

So was Newton’s until Einstein came along.

...

Or until somebody noticed Mercury’s orbit wasn’t what it was predicted to be.

This anomalous rate of precession of the perihelion of Mercury’s orbit was first recognized in 1859 as a problem in celestial mechanics, by Urbain Le Verrier. His reanalysis of available timed observations of transits of Mercury over the Sun’s disk from 1697 to 1848 showed that the actual rate of the precession disagreed from that predicted from Newton’s theory by 38 (arc seconds) per tropical century (later re-estimated at 43” by Simon Newcomb in 1882).


17 posted on 10/11/2017 8:16:01 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: akalinin

Everybody wants to be the next Einstein.


19 posted on 10/11/2017 8:44:11 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: akalinin

Yet Newton remains the standard within the practical realm, up to and including interplanetary travel. The Newtonian view has been humbled, no doubt, in having to acknowledge its status as an approximation, but it carries on.


23 posted on 10/12/2017 12:08:52 AM PDT by dr_lew (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson