Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ForYourChildren

I wondered, why would the NYT do a hit piece on Weinstein now after protecting him and his Hollywood ilk for all these years?

I think there are two possible answers. First, the NYT knew that something big (such as this audio) was going to come out soon and the NYT did not want to appear to be blindsided by this out-of-nowhere news.

Second, it has been reported the Weinstein and Speilberg are arch rivals. Is Steven pulling some strings behind the curtain to destroy Harvey?


7 posted on 10/10/2017 10:53:16 AM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TMA62

“I wondered, why would the NYT do a hit piece on Weinstein now after protecting him and his Hollywood ilk for all these years?”

Yes. This is curious isn’t it?
The NYPD had the recording, and no doubt there were plenty of cops willing to leak this, as they seem to have done. It may have been leaked two years ago.
This burns not just Weinstein but hordes of others, like Vance.
So, as you ask, why now?
Someone was behind this, and it is a coordinated attack.


13 posted on 10/10/2017 10:59:03 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: TMA62

From what I’ve read, a NYT reporter named Sharon Waxman had the big expose written and ready to run in 2004 but Weinstein put the pressure on and got all the sexual harassment stuff pulled out of the article. She quit and started “The Wrap” but the story was out there as were rumors that his brother was pushing it to get control of the company. Some other media outlets were planning to run with it (Page Six for one) and finally the NYT realized it would either have to get ahead of the story or end up explaining why it had been sitting on it for over a decade.

Now they’ll expect to get a pass but will they? Time will tell, but without a doubt the NYT has been as complicit as any other entity in covering up Weinsteins evil deeds for decades.


22 posted on 10/10/2017 11:08:32 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: TMA62
why would the NYT do a hit piece on Weinstein now after protecting him and his Hollywood ilk for all these years?

Speculation I read is that the hard left RATs are trying to purge the "moderate" RATS like Crooked Hillary, Pelosi, etc and Harvey is linked to these "moderates."

69 posted on 10/10/2017 1:04:32 PM PDT by Martin Tell (Honey Badger Don't Care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: TMA62

I think its gotta be bigger than that
Harvey finally jumped the shark
Think about what powerful interest Harvey finally wronged in his arrogance
Think about who has been conspicuously silent and not even approached by the press for a comment
Think about who liberal Hollywood would not even dare to mention as a victim
Not sayin he outright frogged her but maybe he gave her drugs or something or allowed it to happen
The ultimate recent game-changing trophy for ol’ Harvey would have been...


71 posted on 10/10/2017 1:14:54 PM PDT by silverleaf (A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson