Mike Ditka may want to stick to football after his most recent interview.
I was struck that this writer expresses this opinion, based on what are actually some mild comments by Ditka on the protests.
Clearly this writer has a liberal bias. Just saying. Why should he stick to football? Are his opinions really that outrageous, and we are supposed to be shocked, and offended, that he criticizes the protests?
Yes, and the comments are disabled on this article.
This author only survives by hiding behind the internet.
IMHO,The writer is just another liberal fop. Mike’s comments were deadnuts in the center of the bullseye.
Some might get bent out of shape over the 100 yrs remark. I’d say it’s more like 50. Technicalities, LOL.
Ironic, isn’t it? These stinking players are the ones who “decided to not stick with football.” Now the Post Sports writers have taken it on themselves to determine that everybody else must “stick with football” and should not make political comment. Hypocritical & inconsistent!
ATTABOY MIKE!!