Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/09/2017 11:38:01 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

What did Matt Drudge know and when did he know it?

I can understand the New York Times sitting on a story like this for decades, but how did Drudge not get wind of it? Or did he, and nobody paid attention?


2 posted on 10/10/2017 1:24:04 AM PDT by AZLiberty (The logical endpoint of "zero-tolerance history" is zero history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

> The stories were everywhere

It must have been hard to believe that a Hollywood executive was forcing himself on grown women instead of young boys.


3 posted on 10/10/2017 1:24:58 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters ("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

actress revealed on Twitter. Admitting that Weinstein’s reputation was, in fact, actually a well-known secret

so she knew and did nothing....got it...


4 posted on 10/10/2017 1:25:56 AM PDT by Irishguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

In spite of the dominance of the “fake news” artists in America today, the means of exposing something like this are still there and that is a good thing. Evil cannot stand exposure. Their gig is to cover up their hedonism and decadence, for they want their lust for power and sex to be unleased. They resent anything which might stop them from their uncivilized behavior. Some kill to protect those things. Good people rejoice when evil is seen for what it is and the exposure of these things is cleansing for society.


5 posted on 10/10/2017 1:30:09 AM PDT by jazzlite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Weinstein is the poster boy for how the rich, powerful leftist see the rest of us.
We are expendable, disposable peasants to be used at their pleasure.
And to cut their grass.
10 posted on 10/10/2017 3:47:32 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
The stories lead me to believe that Weinstein wasn't a harasser... he was an abuser and a predator.

Let's cut to the chase.

11 posted on 10/10/2017 3:59:21 AM PDT by LoveUSA (God employs Man's strength; Satan exploits Man's weakness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"allegations that Matt Damon and Russell Crowe had a hand in stifling similar accusations against Weinstein in 2004"

This may start to go badly for big time Hollywood people. If it starts to come to light that a bunch of them were enablers of Weinstein, more people may be in trouble. But it's ok, they can just come out and condemn Trump and the NRA and all will be forgiven...
15 posted on 10/10/2017 5:00:32 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The media dug in their archives to find a single Trump comment from a decade ago that branded him a pussy grabber, but ignored evidence in plain sight that Weinstein was likely a rapist and certainly a sexual harasser for at least a decade. Ditto for Bill Clinton. Liberals are hypocrites.


18 posted on 10/10/2017 10:33:49 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcherhttp://www.stone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson