Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

That’s a Rube Goldberg device.

Very large rockets are more likely to work and be practical.

You can generate oxygen and hydrogen fuel easily...make the booster re-usable and the whole thing is pretty cheap to operate.


3 posted on 10/06/2017 7:39:18 PM PDT by Bobalu (The NFL, Watching their demise is more fun than watching their games.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bobalu

“Rube Goldberg”imp,lies senseless complexity.

While ‘startram’ may be a bad idea 9or not) the mechanism is almost as simple as the maglev trains which are in service.


5 posted on 10/06/2017 7:57:20 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bobalu

If we don’t build this, the Chinese will. I guarantee it. And they will do it much faster than anyone would ever believe.

It’s about usable payload, getting mass in space, and doing something with it. Build a nuclear reactor to supply the power, run the tube up the side of a mountain to get as much acceleration as you can before hitting the atmosphere, and start throwing crap up into orbit. Each transport vehicle will be bolted to the space station, pressurized, and available for use.

This is something we should have done decades ago.


12 posted on 10/07/2017 2:25:26 AM PDT by Ronin (Blackface or bolt-ons, it's the same fraud. - Norm Lenhart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson