Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gamecock

This reasoning is used in lots of contexts. “Workforce participation,” for example. Several of my friends and I take care of our own children: not “working” and adding nothing to GDP. If each of us paid the next one over to take care of our children, we’d all be in the “workforce” and all generating taxable income.


5 posted on 10/06/2017 1:54:18 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("The tears of a clown outweigh the sobriety of facts." ~Michelle Malkin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

So brilliant, so true.

And cooking your own food. Treason! No restaurant to tax -— you’re robbing the gubmint!


27 posted on 10/06/2017 3:51:24 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Really off the wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick
If each of us paid the next one over to take care of our children, we’d all be in the “workforce” and all generating taxable income.

Too inefficient. Just tax the mothers directly for the economic value of the childcare they are providing to their children. After all, any good liberal knows that the child belongs to society, and not the parents.

The philosopher that the left follows today said "Your child belongs to us already... What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community." That is what the left in America believes.

28 posted on 10/06/2017 4:01:09 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson