[Tax-chick]

“The image depicts a body or body parts in an undesirable manner,” it said, saying adverts "may not depict a state of health or body weight as being perfect or extremely undesirable".

So Facebook's position is that this baby's condition should be considered just as "desirable" as healthy skin?

Why would any view "feel bad about themselves" upon seeing this? Wouldn't they just feel sympathy for the baby?

[Captain Rhino]

We should coin an acronym for this media behavior (which also afflicts spineless politicians and administrators).

I propose Proactive Snowflake Defense (PSD).

Use: “In another case of blatant PSD, Facebook today banned the posting...etc.”

Perhaps another Freepers can come up with better acronym.

Seems to me that the conservative side has been rather slack recently in creating an alternative psychology (complete with definitions and terms) to label our opponents. Sure, we have BDS and TDS but do we have a fully developed pseudoscientific vocabulary with which to baffle, annoy, and perplex them? Have we exploited possible weaknesses and phobias?