Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68

Playboy in 1953 and Playboy in 1973 are two entirely different things.


227 posted on 09/28/2017 1:36:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
Playboy in 1953 and Playboy in 1973 are two entirely different things.

Not really. Playboy has always been primarily "butts and boobs" with three fairly tame (and later highly airbrushed) pictorials that made an effort to avoid the more gynecological photographs found in competing magazines. If you wanted to see photos of a naked woman's legs spread wide open, you wouldn't find them in Playboy. Not in 1953, 1973, or even 2013.

237 posted on 09/28/2017 3:39:23 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson