Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Oztrich Boy

Our culture has definitely devolved.

100 years ago, accidents were more likely to be fatal. Families without a bread (or carrot) winner had to fend for themselves. Working children were commonplace.

Today, single mothers also fend. Fatherless rabbits must still feed their families. Context changes, realities remain similar.

It’s early and I’m not caffeinated, yet don’t both versions speak to surviving in their own culture and time? Our era is not as charming as the vision Potter painted/wrote. Likely, her era wasn’t, either. The truly dark aspects were simply not popularized. Still, Peter Rabbit _is_ her creation and it remains, regardless of what new interpretations are offered.

Did “West Side Story” somehow obviate “Romeo and Juliet”? Were either more than a gloss on the reality? It’s all entertainment.


22 posted on 09/26/2017 4:08:07 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: reformedliberal
The original didn't hide the darker side of life

Nor did the sequel.

Peter Rabbit Tank Killer

24 posted on 02/06/2018 9:12:50 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson