Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: roadcat

I didn’t need one, not having worn a wristwatch for 20 years or so.
****************
You proved my point , you do not use a watch therefore the “watch” function of the iWatch is irrelevant to you... it isn’t a watch it is a bluetooth gadget.


71 posted on 09/22/2017 3:12:58 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (Show me a peaceful Muslim and I will show you a heretic to the Koran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Neidermeyer
You proved my point , you do not use a watch therefore the “watch” function of the iWatch is irrelevant to you... it isn’t a watch it is a bluetooth gadget.

No, you got it all wrong. I didn't need one before, getting the time from other numerous gadgets I carried or used. But, after buying an Apple Watch, I greatly appreciated the time features in addition to the other apps in use. I don't have to see the watch face, I merely tap it and it verbally tells me the time. I can't do that with any of the other gadgets I had that display the time. Very useful when I need my eyes on something else, I just tap it and it announces the time. So no, the "watch" function on the Apple Watch is far better than most timepieces.

75 posted on 09/22/2017 6:29:45 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson