1 posted on
09/20/2017 7:03:01 PM PDT by
Morgana
To: Morgana
Now that's some imaging technology.
2 posted on
09/20/2017 7:05:01 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: Morgana
3 posted on
09/20/2017 7:27:02 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Morgana
If that kind of imaging technology was made available at any
American theme parks. liberals would set up abortion clinics just outside the park, waiting for the expecting mothers (and dads) to offer them “free” abortions.
4 posted on
09/20/2017 7:44:20 PM PDT by
adorno
(w)
To: Morgana
Hopefully, it also shows weapons.
5 posted on
09/20/2017 7:46:53 PM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: Morgana
But isn't the baby (still in her uterus) at the exact same temperature (37 °C) as all of the surrounding flesh, inner organs, etc. of the mother?
Then how could there be any contrast?
Regards,
6 posted on
09/20/2017 8:47:05 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: Morgana
7 posted on
09/20/2017 8:55:50 PM PDT by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
