If a citizen had done the same thing, would he have been acquitted? Very doubtful. Cops seem to live by a different set of laws than the rest of us do.
I think the decision was probably right. And yet, so is your comment. Citizens should be afforded the same benefit of the doubt when confronting criminals.
So, you feel sorry for a drug dealing scumbag, that rammed his car onto a police car and lead police on a high speed chase, endangering innocent lives in the process?
I would have given a damn if the officer had shot him in the back of the head as soon as fled the scene.
Drug dealers' lives don't matter.
A citizen would not be confronting a dope dealer or chasing him. A citizen has no duty or responsibility to do so and pays taxes for police officers to do this in their stead. With the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws it is far less likely of being convicted. However, you still must be legally and lawfully present and inject the self defense argument.
The court has to prove that the officer was not acting in defense of self or others AND outside the scope of his duties.
This was BS case issued by a retiring DA who was pressured into issuing on it five years later by local SJWs.
It should have never been issued and I hope Stockley sues the City of St. Louis District Attorney’s office for malicious prosecution.
What we are seeing and have seen with Ferguson is political correctness run amok. No one seems to care that Stockley was a West Point Grad and was wounded in the WOT.
Self-defense is a recognized defense for every person in every state.