If you don’t understand and accept this was a regular political action meeting, the kind that happens all the time all over the country, then we have nothing to talk about. All conversation must start with that premise otherwise additional facts can’t be discussed. That was the starting point of this event.
I bet you believe in unicorns and global warming too...
The issue is not what layer of Antifa-type BS excuse you want to make that this started as a simple “political action meeting.” Even if that pipe dream were true, it is meaningless.
The real issue is how it ended. It ended when these drug-dealing scum took out guns and began to murder each other.
It could have started as a Quaker meeting, open air surgery or a Earnest Ainsley Revival, but when it ended with people being murdered, as it did here, the excuse of how it started is meaningless.
It’s very simple: These scum murdered people. Their friends will roll over on them at trial, and the murderers will go to jail for a very long time.
Of course, you will now tell us it was all a plot by the LEO to kill these poor, peace-loving Banditos, etc.
As to the end-game, it is a legal scenario that is played out time and again every day. There is enough physical evidence to charge some of these defendants in these cases with killing other people. A jury will decide their guilt or innocence. Their lawyers obviously believe there is enough evidence to convict their clients, because they are doing everything they can to prevent the juries from hearing any of that evidence.
Please stop trying to distort the realities of this case for FReepers. And thank you for the Ad Hominem attack. FReepers recognize them as the last resort of a failed debater.
“If you don’t understand and accept this was a regular political action meeting,”
ROTFLMAO!