Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: chaosagent

You are reading a Def lawyer’s motion.

There is no prohibition against jail’s/Sheriff’s use of recordings in any way they saw fit. In the cited case, SA recused. There will be dozens of cases cited in the reply to the motion where SA did not recuse, as he has no duty to do so.

Notice Def counsel said SA “did the honorable thing.” He did not claim the SA was under any obligation to do so.

Def lawyer and Def stupidly spoke on an unsecured line. Now they are paying the penalty for such stupidity.


25 posted on 09/14/2017 7:10:30 PM PDT by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Strac6

So you’re basically saying that the Hunt County DA and the district court judge just recused themselves for the fun of it?

That they didn’t have anything better to do that day?

Or did they realize they screwed up?


30 posted on 09/14/2017 8:16:25 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson