This has nothing to do with the wishes of the family to give the child a life. It has to do with a lawsuit they filed.
In the article from the East Bay Times, it states:
“An attorney for the family is arguing Jahi is alive and therefore entitled to more than the cap of $250,000 on medical malpractice lawsuits involving children who die as a result of surgery.”
It has nothing to do with the welfare of the child or the determination of quality of life. It has to do with the courts awarding more money to the family using a loophold in the law.
They should be embarrassed.
rwood
.
Your opinion only; utterly devoid of facts.
.
.
It has to do only with the fact that UCSF had already sold her organs.
That is the sole reason for the court fight.