“...Cindy Pratt not only saw Stanley Ann Dunham in HI; she lived in the same house with her. No, it wasn’t a case of mistaken identify. Stanley Ann took her baby and showed him to Cindy after she returned to HI.”
repeating comment 66:
I looked for Cindy’s comments to Maraniss and all I could find was this:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/06/maraniss_bio_deepens_obama_birth_mystery.html
“Maraniss hints at where home was not — namely, the residence her parents shared with the Pratt family at 6085 Kalanianole Highway, the address listed on the birth certificate. As Maraniss relates, the Pratt daughter, then an adolescent, “has no memory of the Dunhams’ daughter bringing an infant home.” He adds, “[Ann] and Obama and the infant never lived [at 6085 Kalanianole].”
As I do not have access to the book, perhaps you could quote from it, exactly what she said to Maraniss. Thanks.
============end quote
May I suggest we drop it now? I really don’t want to repeat everything I’ve been trying to show since heaven knows how long ago...and you don’t want to see it, right? It’s futile, we are both just defending our own impressions, and there’s no progress possible. Like I said earlier, you were two thirds of the way there, and two out of three isn’t all that bad.
Okay, I have the link. It’s a huge, massive excerpt from the Maraniss book, and I’ll never read all of it. However, I’ve read the part where Maraniss describes “Stanley Ann,” living in the hallway outside her parents’ room in the house they shared with the Pratts. I’ve also read about “Ann’s” return to HI. In a babysitter crisis, she would drop Little Barry off at the Pratt’s furniture store, and go to her classes. Cindy described how Little Barry woukd jump on the mattresses and giggle.
Before I send you the link, I am curious as to how you will debunk it. That is your pattern. If you receive information friendly to your theory, you pontificate that it’s true. If you are presented with information that undercuts your theory, you debunk it.
I’m curious as to how you will reject this evidence. Yesterday you said Cindy wasn’t lying. I assume today she will be?