[DiogenesLamp]

It’s not very often one sees someone speaking well of the Scott v. Sanford decision, but then again you never cease to amaze me.

You call it speaking "well", I call it speaking "objectively."

I don't have to agree with something to recognize that it is correct according to the laws of that time period.

[DoodleDawg]

You call it speaking "well", I call it speaking "objectively."

Objectively? LOL!

I don't have to agree with something to recognize that it is correct according to the laws of that time period.

But agreeing with it is just icing on the cake for you.