Posted on 08/23/2017 1:12:56 PM PDT by Cecily
As their relationship heats up so do rumours of their engagement with the world eagerly anticipating the marriage of Prince Harry to girlfriend Meghan Markle.
And while some predicted that the royal might pop the question on Meghan's birthday at the beginning of August royal insiders predict that we could be looking at a Christmas proposal.
Former chef to Princess Diana and her two sons Darren McGrady anticipates that the couple will announce their marriage plans this December.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Check out Diana's sisters.
Sadly, I think you may be right.
Good and very nice to be on the same side with you, as we usually are. :-)
The Queen MUST approve of her children's and grandchildren's marriages.
Nope...much more like Diana’s idiot brother.
Are there any hats yet?
Is that enough to be called a tramp? Would you pastor approve of that? maybe you are a sweet person - but you sound otherwise.
Her dating/marriage history makes her a TRAMP, as well as a GOLD DIGGER.
You obviously don't know much of anything at all about Meghan, so go do some research.
And being a supercilious prig, is just SO unbecoming; diddums. Go ask YOUR pastor, priest, or rabbi, what he thinks about your behavior. Bless your heart......
Funny.
If the Queen were to withhold her consent, Harry could wait one year, after going through some formalities and then marry. Doubt it would come to that.
Oh, the show ‘Suits’ is porn? I did not know that.
Or were you looking at some of the photoshopped porn fakes being reported?
dating/marriage history? lol ok.
Gold Digger - she is worth 5 million and still working.
I do not see the big deal.
Are you even British?
Be sure to let the Queen know about your puritanical disapproval.
I think we can both agree, at least, that there is a supercilious prig in this conversation.
You're talking about her supposed "net worth" now; ignoring whom she dated, married, divorced and dated prior to hooking up with Harry. And $5 million dollars, is chump change to the Royals.
What's the matter, diddums....got the "hots" for her and that's why you are coming to her "aid"? *snicker
Bet you had to look up "supercilious prig"; good...now you know what you are.
I feel bad for you. I hope your ignorant and backwards thinking did not affect any children in your life, that would be a shame. Calling me ‘didums’ - I assume you are much nastier to women in person. Nobody logs on the FR to hear what someone like you has to say about famous women - I hope you have an epiphany before you die and are judged, for your sake.
I doubt that anyone does that to read your posts!
Oh I've influenced/educated many children, teens, and adults and they're all happier and more intelligent for knowing me. Also, not a one of them of either sex, would EVER call me "nasty".
You can't write grammatically correct simple English prose, you can't even copy the spelling of a word ("diddums is spelled with two "D"s) I used ( which obviously you don't know the meaning of ), and the ONLY truly "IGNORANT" and uneducated person on this thread is YOU! Bless your heart.
Meghan is NOT all THAT "famous" and ONLY is now, because she is copulating, prior to marriage or even an engagement, with a, wild, undisciplined, still a child at the age of 32 boy-man, British Royal.
Best worry about how YOU shall be judged, by GOD; unlike I.
Thanks, now we know all we need to about you.
But do, have the last word, since it appears that that is what you must have; snowflake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.